Football
Football » English » Open Discussion
-
Royal Baby
By jamiescfc2010 - 22-07-2013 21:41
William and Kate have a bouncing baby boy :D what you guys make of it?
Views: 676 Posts: 23
- Page 1
-
Re: Royal Baby
By zefrenchy - 22-07-2013 22:48
mattsadler wrote:Don't care.
I'd like to second that.
Unless they call it Adolf or some sort of compass heading (South By Southwest Windsor), then I'm totally engrossed in the next 40-50 years of it's life.
Eddie.
-
Re: Royal Baby
By madmonk - 23-07-2013 00:25
zefrenchy wrote:or some sort of compass heading ...
I was trying to think what the equivalent would be: Full Windsor, Half Windsor or (start the campaign here) Legoland Windsor?
-
Re: Royal Baby
By mattsadler - 23-07-2013 07:40
Where's our bank holiday? Come on Prime Minister get this sorted, you've got your payrise, now work for it! It would have to be be Duplo Windsor as it would irresponsible to have a child choking on Legobricks.
-
Re: Royal Baby
By deleted_5240478 - 23-07-2013 08:36
I recon they should call the baby Diana-Mandela . . .
But in all honesty I think the baby should be called Argyle Windsor.
-
Re: Royal Baby
By frankzappa - 23-07-2013 12:15
It going to be named Qatar Airways in a sponsorship deal...
http://www.panarabiaenquirer.com/wordpress/royal-baby-to-be-named-qatar-airways-after-landmark-sponsorship-deal/
-
Re: Royal Baby
By zefrenchy - 23-07-2013 18:34
kingjaime wrote:Dodi?
You passed the line that I was sceptical about crossing.
I am LOVING Legoland Windsor.
Eddie.
-
Re: Royal Baby
By kingjaime - 23-07-2013 20:20
Frankie Boyle or someone of his type will nick that joke and make headlines and lots of money :(
-
Re: Royal Baby
By zefrenchy - 24-07-2013 02:10
kingjaime wrote:Frankie Boyle or someone of his type will nick that joke and make headlines and lots of money :(
After spending under 2 minute on Frankie Boyle's twitter, he's well past that unmarked line in the sand that you can't go back from.
Eddie.
-
Re: Royal Baby
By gamersrule - 29-07-2013 17:23
Anyone can have a baby, so why should i care? if was kate infertile and still got pregnant then maybe id care, just maybe
-
Re: Royal Baby
By ashleyhughes - 29-07-2013 17:54
I'm excited about it in a way since it will be a future king and I love Will and Kate (having actually met them last year in London whilst at the Olympic Games) but yes it's a baby at the same time.
Better thread than when I had to shoot down a group of Republicans.
-
Re: Royal Baby
By kingjaime - 29-07-2013 21:24
What I like is the big propaganda about it being "our future king", which ignores the following possibilities:
(1) Dies before it's dad abdicates/dies.
(2) Decides it just doesn't want to be monarch.
(3) Grows up as an increasingly avowed anti-monarchist and accepts the position up to the point of coronation, at which point, broadcast live around the world, vociferously renounces/recants the "institution" and the rights and privileges any members of the royal family enjoy.
(4) Develops gender identity issues and undergoes a sex change at some point. Thus becoming Queen.
Bear in mind also the possibility, and I know more than one person who thinks this, that Kate was never pregnant and this is a Rothschild baby or something. (Which seems odd because I would've thought if there's any sort of caste system the lizards operate by, the royals are surely pretty much the top of it. And if they're not, why be fussed about replacing one of them as future monarch? Odd.)
- Page 1
Follow us on: Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube
Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | General Rules | Cookie Declaration
Copyright © Power Challenge AB, 2001-2024. All rights reserved.