Hockey » English » ManagerZone talk

Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By semych - 15-07-2013 21:03

Seems like we're getting a boost in all skills here. And what do you think, guys about ITC, YCC etc.? [:)]Seems like we're getting a boost in all skills here.
And what do you think, guys about ITC, YCC etc.?

 

Page 1

 

Reply

Last Message

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By deleted_5240478 - 16-07-2013 08:28

It should be interesting developments. May affect who goes where and when.It should be interesting developments. May affect who goes where and when.

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By wholle - 16-07-2013 09:19

[Crew]

Hope you like the planned changes! If you have any questions we'll try to answer them here.Hope you like the planned changes! If you have any questions we'll try to answer them here.

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By deleted_5240478 - 16-07-2013 10:10

Does this start next season?Does this start next season?

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By chowders - 16-07-2013 10:54

Says season 40, Brian, so next season for hockey.Says season 40, Brian, so next season for hockey.

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By deleted_5240478 - 16-07-2013 11:29

I thought so... thanksI thought so... thanks

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By semych - 16-07-2013 11:38

In season 40, how do I know which one of my newly acquired youngsters is best suited to become a goalie/ a field player?In season 40, how do I know which one of my newly acquired youngsters is best suited to become a goalie/ a field player?

Sv: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By wholle - 17-07-2013 09:16

[Crew]

You should be able to get clues from the training a player undertake and from the Club Physio which we'll introduce at a later state.

semych wrote:

In season 40, how do I know which one of my newly acquired youngsters is best suited to become a goalie/ a field player?

You should be able to get clues from the training a player undertake and from the Club Physio which we'll introduce at a later state.

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By deleted_5240478 - 17-07-2013 13:22

What I like is the ability to sack 4 players at a time. Excellent idea. now to get a auto doubles button :)What I like is the ability to sack 4 players at a time. Excellent idea. now to get a auto doubles button :)

Re: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By semych - 19-07-2013 10:54

Thank you, wholle. BTW, can I send exchanged players to [b]YCC[/b] on 42nd day?Thank you, wholle.
BTW, can I send exchanged players to YCC on 42nd day?

Sv: Training 2.0 and Training Camps

By prednibe - 19-07-2013 16:06

[MZ]

Everyone seems to be focusing on the details of the training! But what will the consequences of Training 2.0 be for MZ? If players reach their maximum levels earlier than today - and the new detoriation is set at a drop of 3 pucks until retirement - [color=blue]then there will be double the number of elite-players in a close future[/color]. And the number of actual competetive clubs are at the same time shrinking. [b]So less hockey clubs, more elite players, and no risk for retirement if you can afford the new younger eliteplayers.[/b] This is setting up a totally new MZ where [b]the finances[/b] of every club is the only factor for success or not. If you can afford it: buy the best young elite-players, get payed for your investment in revenue, and sell your players when +30 for a good surplus. Then buy even better young players and continue in the same fashion. Today MZ-hockey has found a very delicate balance where clubs can invest in elite players and with the right tactic get good revenue,[b] but also risk losing the players to retirement.[/b] [color=blue]By voiding the latter risk, MZ is taking a monumental leap into a mis-balanced game where tactics is downgraded in regard to finance.[/color] The transfer will be the only way to success. And that is not the MZ I love.Everyone seems to be focusing on the details of the training!

But what will the consequences of Training 2.0 be for MZ?

If players reach their maximum levels earlier than today
- and the new detoriation is set at a drop of 3 pucks until retirement - then there will be double the number of elite-players in a close future.

And the number of actual competetive clubs are at the same time shrinking.

So less hockey clubs, more elite players, and no risk for retirement if you can afford the new younger eliteplayers.

This is setting up a totally new MZ where the finances of every club is the only factor for success or not.

If you can afford it:
buy the best young elite-players,
get payed for your investment in revenue,
and sell your players when +30 for a good surplus.
Then buy even better young players and continue in the same fashion.

Today MZ-hockey has found a very delicate balance where clubs can invest in elite players and with the right tactic get good revenue, but also risk losing the players to retirement.

By voiding the latter risk, MZ is taking a monumental leap into a mis-balanced game where tactics is downgraded in regard to finance.

The transfer will be the only way to success.
And that is not the MZ I love.

 

Page 1