Football » English » Suggestions/Improvements

Lower taxes for long serving players

By navai - 16-06-2015 19:03

I know current taxes exist for many reasons including detering cheats but what about looking at the long run? If i buy a 19 year old for 2,000 and send him to 3 consecutive training camps costing me about 30,000 X 3 = 90,000 im already 92,000 invested into this player. Using the current system, if i then go to sell him at to make any profit from him, i need to sell him above 109,000 to make any profit, if i sell him for anything less than that i am selling at a loss. This is not reflective of a real business world. I think the 90day transfer rule should be increased to 150 days (3 seasons) BUT the tax droped to around 2.5-5%. This will give incentive to buy and sell players solely for training, by increasing the minimum tive before the tax drops, it erradicates the cheating scare (you'd have to be a pretty ambitious cheat to wait half a year to move players about) and this might also give the transfer markets the boost which they desperately needI know current taxes exist for many reasons including detering cheats but what about looking at the long run?
If i buy a 19 year old for 2,000 and send him to 3 consecutive training camps costing me about 30,000 X 3 = 90,000 im already 92,000 invested into this player.
Using the current system, if i then go to sell him at to make any profit from him, i need to sell him above 109,000 to make any profit, if i sell him for anything less than that i am selling at a loss. This is not reflective of a real business world.
I think the 90day transfer rule should be increased to 150 days (3 seasons) BUT the tax droped to around 2.5-5%. This will give incentive to buy and sell players solely for training, by increasing the minimum tive before the tax drops, it erradicates the cheating scare (you'd have to be a pretty ambitious cheat to wait half a year to move players about) and this might also give the transfer markets the boost which they desperately need

 

Page 1

 

Reply

Last Message

Re: Lower taxes for long serving players

By navai - 16-06-2015 19:10

Thats suppose to say 5 seasonsThats suppose to say 5 seasons

Re: Lower taxes for long serving players

By gerrad_08 - 16-06-2015 19:25

[INDIA]

well that's a good way to look. Another angle is E.G. in Season 50 u purchased a player for 1000 now in end of season 54. for each season the cost should be increased by certain percentage points [b](which will be decided by the number of TC attended and total number of gain he has got)[/b] assuming that he grew by 25% each year his value 3052 at the end of season 54.well that's a good way to look.
Another angle is
E.G. in Season 50 u purchased a player for 1000 now in end of season 54. for each season the cost should be increased by certain percentage points (which will be decided by the number of TC attended and total number of gain he has got)
assuming that he grew by 25% each year his value 3052 at the end of season 54.

Re: Lower taxes for long serving players

By ivorylegend - 30-06-2015 14:30

[MZ UKI]

Don't forget that he probably has a salary of 2k a week, for 13-15 weeks a season, x 3 seasons. Probably means you would need to sell for 200k in order to turn a profit...Don't forget that he probably has a salary of 2k a week, for 13-15 weeks a season, x 3 seasons.

Probably means you would need to sell for 200k in order to turn a profit...

 

Page 1