Football » English » Suggestions/Improvements

The worth of YTC...

By sirchesmiller - 16-05-2014 10:36

[CIA]

[b]I believe YTC is a good medium to see what a player could become in the future but PLEASE...[/b] If there's a player with 7 balls (unmaxed) tackling it is definitely going to be a defender and [u]NOT a goalkeeper[/u]! If there's a player which seems to be a great future midfielder, it is [u]NOT going to be a goalkeeper[/u]! Now you will say: "If you know he's going to be a midfielder/defender, why would you use YTC?" Well that's because the other TC's weren't good enough for these players. And because people who want to buy these players, want to know there YTC's, that's why! I know there have been complaints enough about this to deal with it. If a player has got a maximum of 2 balls for each skill, then you can still change him to a goalkeeper, but if he's got 7 balls tackling, he's not going to be a goalkeeper... I've also noticed that it's always players who actually ARE going to be goalkeepers, or players that have been exchanged, even though the scouting report told me that the player was going to be a midfielder. Please, change this. I've got two players (as I mentioned) who will not be able to go on a TC for the rest of the season !!! This is very frustrating! If the crew isn't planning to change this, then AT LEAST give me back the chance to send these guys on a TC!!!I believe YTC is a good medium to see what a player could become in the future but PLEASE...

If there's a player with 7 balls (unmaxed) tackling it is definitely going to be a defender and NOT a goalkeeper!
If there's a player which seems to be a great future midfielder, it is NOT going to be a goalkeeper!

Now you will say: "If you know he's going to be a midfielder/defender, why would you use YTC?"
Well that's because the other TC's weren't good enough for these players. And because people who want to buy these players, want to know there YTC's, that's why!

I know there have been complaints enough about this to deal with it. If a player has got a maximum of 2 balls for each skill, then you can still change him to a goalkeeper, but if he's got 7 balls tackling, he's not going to be a goalkeeper...

I've also noticed that it's always players who actually ARE going to be goalkeepers, or players that have been exchanged, even though the scouting report told me that the player was going to be a midfielder. Please, change this. I've got two players (as I mentioned) who will not be able to go on a TC for the rest of the season !!!

This is very frustrating! If the crew isn't planning to change this, then AT LEAST give me back the chance to send these guys on a TC!!!

 

Page 1

 

Reply

Last Message

Ant: The worth of YTC...

By sirchesmiller - 16-05-2014 10:37

[CIA]

*their YTC's...*their YTC's...

Re: The worth of YTC...

By mosmosmos - 19-05-2014 01:06

[ENG]

I can't agree. You know the risks of sending to YTC. IF there wasn't a TC you liked, you shouldn't have sent anyone.I can't agree. You know the risks of sending to YTC. IF there wasn't a TC you liked, you shouldn't have sent anyone.

Re: The worth of YTC...

By ivorylegend - 26-05-2014 21:18

[MZ UKI]

They change twice a week, so you can see what is coming up next. Either send a different player, or wait 5 days or so until the camps change.They change twice a week, so you can see what is coming up next.

Either send a different player, or wait 5 days or so until the camps change.

Re: The worth of YTC...

By tosspot - 29-05-2014 06:42

[AUSNZ]

So let me get this straight... You thought the risk of sending your player to a YTC that could choose ANY skill was better than: a) choosing a TC that may not have been perfect, but was at least predictable b) waiting for the TCs to change (which is now twice weekly) I think I know where the problem lies.So let me get this straight...

You thought the risk of sending your player to a YTC that could choose ANY skill was better than:
a) choosing a TC that may not have been perfect, but was at least predictable
b) waiting for the TCs to change (which is now twice weekly)

I think I know where the problem lies.

 

Page 1