Football » English » Suggestions/Improvements

Larger bench

By mihairo - 08-07-2021 06:26

[-FO-]

I made this suggestion since 2012, as I recall. We need a larger bench, with 7 players. Also, as I recall, everyone agreed with me. Now I have 18 senior players and only 2 of them need TC. Next season I will have 19 seniors etc. Even in RL we have 4 possible substitutions, not to mention the 5th substitution in over-time. My suggestion 9 years ago was this: 3 DMF substitutes and 3 DMf reserves. Currently we have DMFJ. The 4th player is a Jolly Joker. A player that can enter the field on any position on the field. Now that's just impossible. If the player is so good to play any position, he would probably not sit on the bench. We need this ASAP.I made this suggestion since 2012, as I recall.
We need a larger bench, with 7 players.
Also, as I recall, everyone agreed with me.
Now I have 18 senior players and only 2 of them need TC.
Next season I will have 19 seniors etc.
Even in RL we have 4 possible substitutions, not to mention the 5th substitution in over-time.

My suggestion 9 years ago was this: 3 DMF substitutes and 3 DMf reserves.
Currently we have DMFJ. The 4th player is a Jolly Joker. A player that can enter the field on any position on the field. Now that's just impossible. If the player is so good to play any position, he would probably not sit on the bench.

We need this ASAP.

 

Page 1 2

Next

Reply

Last Message

Re: Larger bench

By chucky06 - 08-07-2021 08:43

[AUSNZ]
President

I like this! Definitely on board. Would help younger players gain experience faster too elevating the useless players between 24-27 atmI like this! Definitely on board. Would help younger players gain experience faster too elevating the useless players between 24-27 atm

Re: Larger bench

By afeliciano (NCA) - 15-07-2021 15:43

[FCP_DF]

Years ago I said the same. Please crew, change bench to 7 players. It will solve form problem and the lack of experience in many players.Years ago I said the same.

Please crew, change bench to 7 players.

It will solve form problem and the lack of experience in many players.

Re: Larger bench

By mihairo - 16-07-2021 06:19

[-FO-]

Also, why not have in MZ what is RL football? Why not be able to make 4 or even 5 substitutions in 3 sets? That would be 3+1+1 or 2+2+1. This means only two sets during 90 minutes and the 3rd set in over-time. You can even go for 2+1+2 or even 2+0+3 (3 substitutions in over-time). Come on people, is this real football or is this real football?Also, why not have in MZ what is RL football?
Why not be able to make 4 or even 5 substitutions in 3 sets?
That would be 3+1+1 or 2+2+1.
This means only two sets during 90 minutes and the 3rd set in over-time.

You can even go for 2+1+2 or even 2+0+3 (3 substitutions in over-time).

Come on people, is this real football or is this real football?

Re: Larger bench

By mihairo - 16-07-2021 06:21

[-FO-]

Also a very important thing. You can even go for introducing a reserve striker in the 120th minute for penalty shootouts. Imagine what we can do.Also a very important thing. You can even go for introducing a reserve striker in the 120th minute for penalty shootouts.

Imagine what we can do.

Re: Larger bench

By afeliciano (NCA) - 01-11-2021 21:48

[FCP_DF]

It's very important 7 players in the bench for everyone control better form and experience. Five substitutions are also a nice feature to add. By the way, remove the golden goal in extra time.It's very important 7 players in the bench for everyone control better form and experience.

Five substitutions are also a nice feature to add.

By the way, remove the golden goal in extra time.

Re: Larger bench

By charef (FA) (NC) - 03-11-2021 00:13

[PV]

I agree, i had the same idea yesterday when i was managing national team.I agree, i had the same idea yesterday when i was managing national team.

Re: Larger bench

By viedras20 - 03-11-2021 08:12

[LT-Cm]

Agreed 👍Agreed 👍

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 04-11-2021 09:58

Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things: [ol] [li]larger bench,[/li] [li]more substitutions,[/li] [li]removing the golden goal and[/li] [li]don't forget [u]the goalkeeper problem[/u]: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.[/li] [/ol]Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things:

1. larger bench,
2. more substitutions,
3. removing the golden goal and
4. don't forget the goalkeeper problem: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.

Edited: 18-02-2022 12:17
Total edits: 2

Re: Larger bench

By webregas - 18-11-2021 00:20

[ENG]

Agree with a larger bench. Would question the impact of more subs. I can only see it increasing the gap between top and bottom sides in the long run. Would potentially increase activity in the over 30 transfer market too (jury out for me on whether that’s a positive).Agree with a larger bench.

Would question the impact of more subs.

I can only see it increasing the gap between top and bottom sides in the long run. Would potentially increase activity in the over 30 transfer market too (jury out for me on whether that’s a positive).

Re: Larger bench

By mihairo - 18-11-2021 10:18

[-FO-]

Thank you for the feedback. It is, indeed, possible to boost the Transfer Market as well. Why? Simple. Because if the strong teams have the opportunity to make more substitutiins, that would force the other teams to make more substitutions to stand up to them as well.Thank you for the feedback.
It is, indeed, possible to boost the Transfer Market as well.
Why? Simple.
Because if the strong teams have the opportunity to make more substitutiins, that would force the other teams to make more substitutions to stand up to them as well.

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 19-11-2021 17:18

Apparently the Crew is working on the bankruptcy. I hope improving the bench is next in their to do list.Apparently the Crew is working on the bankruptcy. I hope improving the bench is next in their to do list.

Re: Larger bench

By mauro16 (NCA) - 04-01-2022 18:44

[FAI]

👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼

goalsaurus wrote:

Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things:

1. larger bench,
2. more substitutions,
3. removing the golden goal and
4. don't forget the goalkeeper problem: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.

👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👆🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼👌🏼

Re: Larger bench

By mauro16 (NCA) - 04-01-2022 18:46

[FAI]

Their list of priorities always seems to be far from what users expect or need 😴

goalsaurus wrote:

Apparently the Crew is working on the bankruptcy. I hope improving the bench is next in their to do list.

Their list of priorities always seems to be far from what users expect or need 😴

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 20-01-2022 10:48

Can somebody tell me how many players can sit in the bench in real life football now?Can somebody tell me how many players can sit in the bench in real life football now?

Re: Larger bench

By mihairo - 20-01-2022 12:30

[-FO-]

7 (Keeper + 6 Players)7 (Keeper + 6 Players)

Re: Larger bench

By mihairo - 20-01-2022 12:36

[-FO-]

PS: When you start a competition, you can use a list of 23 players. That list can be updated once, around half through the schedule. For e.g. After group stages, before the Playoffs.PS: When you start a competition, you can use a list of 23 players.
That list can be updated once, around half through the schedule.
For e.g. After group stages, before the Playoffs.

Re: Larger bench

By maradona1960 - 20-01-2022 16:28

[MZ]

+1+1

Re: Larger bench

By onjatep - 29-01-2022 03:22

[BRAU18]

I agree , but for this to go ahead you need 20 users agreeingI agree , but for this to go ahead you need 20 users agreeing

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 29-01-2022 12:25

onjatep, is that some kind of rule? I have never heard about it.onjatep, is that some kind of rule? I have never heard about it.

Re: Larger bench

By onjatep - 01-02-2022 20:25

[BRAU18]

In the brazilian forum there is one of the fixed topics that are sent by the FA when they reach 20 users agreeing, almost no post achieves this and we haven't had anything new in the game for a long time

goalsaurus wrote:

onjatep, is that some kind of rule? I have never heard about it.

In the brazilian forum there is one of the fixed topics that are sent by the FA when they reach 20 users agreeing, almost no post achieves this and we haven't had anything new in the game for a long time

Re: Larger bench

By onjatep - 02-02-2022 00:08

[BRAU18]

https://www.managerzone.com/?p=forum&sub=topic&topic_id=11903471&forum_id=50&sport=soccer

goalsaurus wrote:

onjatep, is that some kind of rule? I have never heard about it.

https://www.managerzone.com/?p=forum&sub=topic&topic_id=11903471&forum_id=50&sport=soccer

Re: Larger bench

By deleted_3858292 - 02-02-2022 17:15

i agree with 7 ! Maybe something like this: goalkeeper defender 1 defender 2 midfielder 1 midfielder 2 forward 1 forward 2 "1" having priority to enter in case injury happensi agree with 7 ! Maybe something like this:
goalkeeper
defender 1
defender 2
midfielder 1
midfielder 2
forward 1
forward 2
"1" having priority to enter in case injury happens

Re: Larger bench

By k33n3y - 03-02-2022 02:16

I love seeing suggestions from experienced players. I've suggested dozens of things now. What ive learned is you have slim to no chance at anything being implemented. I actually think this is the worst game I've interacted with in regards to feedback from developers. It is atrocious. Yet here we all are still buying tokens. They service they offer to uses is nothing short of a disgrace.I love seeing suggestions from experienced players. I've suggested dozens of things now.

What ive learned is you have slim to no chance at anything being implemented.

I actually think this is the worst game I've interacted with in regards to feedback from developers. It is atrocious. Yet here we all are still buying tokens. They service they offer to uses is nothing short of a disgrace.

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 03-02-2022 23:21

onjatep, I cannot speak spanish, can you point out the precise line or can you link the English page?onjatep, I cannot speak spanish, can you point out the precise line or can you link the English page?

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 03-02-2022 23:23

PS I can't speak Portuguese either.PS I can't speak Portuguese either.

Re: Larger bench

By onjatep - 10-02-2022 01:07

[BRAU18]

NOTE ABOUT Suggestions&Improvements If any topic has the characteristics below, the FA responsible for verifying the suggestions will be obliged to send the proposal to CREW: a) have at least 20 people approving the idea; b) at least 2 users approving the idea in the topic for each user who disapproves the suggestion. I emphasize that the FA is responsible for sending the suggestion. Not by acceptance. CREW makes the final decision, every time. The FA will not explain the reasons for not accepting the proposal. Note that a proposal may take time to be accepted, be discussed by XA's from other countries, be adapted or be completely rejected.

goalsaurus wrote:

PS I can't speak Portuguese either.

NOTE ABOUT Suggestions&Improvements

If any topic has the characteristics below, the FA responsible for verifying the suggestions will be obliged to send the proposal to CREW:

a) have at least 20 people approving the idea;
b) at least 2 users approving the idea in the topic for each user who disapproves the suggestion.

I emphasize that the FA is responsible for sending the suggestion. Not by acceptance.
CREW makes the final decision, every time.
The FA will not explain the reasons for not accepting the proposal.

Note that a proposal may take time to be accepted, be discussed by XA's from other countries, be adapted or be completely rejected.

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 11-02-2022 14:04

Ok, in this case, I am happy to tell you that in Italy no one disagrees with those four things I wrote before. Since we are 12 on this page I hope there are more than 8 active users in Italy... 🙂Ok, in this case, I am happy to tell you that in Italy no one disagrees with those four things I wrote before. Since we are 12 on this page I hope there are more than 8 active users in Italy... 🙂

Sv: Larger bench

By tiger13 - 11-02-2022 22:42

[LEGEND]

Agree, 1 + 1 slot for each placement on the course, plus a random slot. No slot for keeper.Agree, 1 + 1 slot for each placement on the course, plus a random slot. No slot for keeper.

Ri: Larger bench

By msilvi (MA) - 18-02-2022 12:18

[BDL]
President

I agree with all the above and I hope they will soon be in the crew list of updates

goalsaurus wrote:

Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things:

1. larger bench,
2. more substitutions,
3. removing the golden goal and
4. don't forget the goalkeeper problem: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.

I agree with all the above and I hope they will soon be in the crew list of updates

Re: Larger bench

By herrio - 18-02-2022 14:00

[MZ]

+1+1

Ri: Larger bench

By fmalex86 - 18-02-2022 14:24

[FIMZ]

totally agree

goalsaurus wrote:

Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things:

1. larger bench,
2. more substitutions,
3. removing the golden goal and
4. don't forget the goalkeeper problem: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.

totally agree

Ri: Larger bench

By yokupoku (RA) - 23-02-2022 14:26

[FALCO]
President

+1

goalsaurus wrote:

Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things:

1. larger bench,
2. more substitutions,
3. removing the golden goal and
4. don't forget the goalkeeper problem: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.

+1

Ri: Larger bench

By hectoraulfajolovic - 27-02-2022 18:29

[FIMZ]

It's a very nice idea. I'm totally agree +1It's a very nice idea. I'm totally agree

+1

Ri: Larger bench

By filtrus - 27-02-2022 18:50

[FALCO]

+1+1

Ri: Larger bench

By cortesini - 05-03-2022 19:17

+1+1

Ri: Larger bench

By saucho - 06-03-2022 13:40

+1+1

Ri: Larger bench

By goalsaurus (LA) - 07-03-2022 19:03

How many are we now? 😁How many are we now? 😁

Απ: Larger bench

By birginia (NC) - 07-03-2022 22:45

[Greece]
President

+1

goalsaurus wrote:

Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things:

1. larger bench,
2. more substitutions,
3. removing the golden goal and
4. don't forget the goalkeeper problem: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.

+1

Re: Larger bench

By onjatep - 07-03-2022 23:37

[BRAU18]

u need a FA to send this suggestion... who is the FA responsible for the english forum? 👀

goalsaurus wrote:

How many are we now? 😁

u need a FA to send this suggestion... who is the FA responsible for the english forum? 👀

Re: Larger bench

By disinocht - 08-03-2022 11:10

[204]
President

I'll pass this on.

onjatep wrote:

u need a FA to send this suggestion... who is the FA responsible for the english forum? 👀

I'll pass this on.

Sv: Larger bench

By freddemand - 08-03-2022 20:02

[TDF]

+1 from me. The possibility for extra experience would be awsome!+1 from me. The possibility for extra experience would be awsome!

Re: Larger bench

By deleted_3858292 - 21-03-2022 16:25

i wonder what crew is thinking. this must be a priority, larger bench ! its 2022 and the bench still looks as it is now.

j-league wrote:

i agree with 7 ! Maybe something like this:
goalkeeper
defender 1
defender 2
midfielder 1
midfielder 2
forward 1
forward 2
"1" having priority to enter in case injury happens

i wonder what crew is thinking. this must be a priority, larger bench ! its 2022 and the bench still looks as it is now.

Re: Larger bench

By maradona1960 - 21-03-2022 23:40

[MZ]

Do we have any news?

disinocht wrote:

I'll pass this on.

Do we have any news?

Re: Larger bench

By disinocht - 22-03-2022 13:13

[204]
President

Not yet. But I'm sure it's on their mind. I'm not sure of the complexity of increasing it so I can't really say anything more than that.

maradona1960 wrote:

Do we have any news?

Not yet. But I'm sure it's on their mind. I'm not sure of the complexity of increasing it so I can't really say anything more than that.

Re: Larger bench

By mihairo - 22-03-2022 17:54

[-FO-]

Thanks everybody for the feedback.Thanks everybody for the feedback.

Re: Larger bench

By hontiponti - 28-03-2022 23:05

[BGB]

+1+1

Отн: Larger bench

By naskoch (LA) - 29-03-2022 22:31

[BUL]

+1+1

Απ: Larger bench

By totalwar - 31-03-2022 15:51

+1+1

Re: Larger bench

By roseto - 04-04-2022 17:15

+1+1

Odp: Larger bench

By firefox78 - 05-04-2022 21:39

[DC]

+1

goalsaurus wrote:

Yep, somebody suggested that in Italy as well. Years ago. We need all those things:

1. larger bench,
2. more substitutions,
3. removing the golden goal and
4. don't forget the goalkeeper problem: we can't use him now and that is a lost slot.

+1

 

Page 1 2

Next