I see that when a player gets a red card, one of the attackers with the most balls for defense takes his place. But I disagree with this method. Isn't it better that the team tries to cover the hole with the team play instead?
I was leading 2-0 after the first half and 2-1 after the beginning of the second half, then my central defender got second yellow card and was replaced by an attacker, and I lost 7-2 after that, because the attacker on the defender's position was useless and pointless like he was not present there at all. So, I effectively lost 2 players instead of one. He would have been better if remained in offense, and the rest of the defenders to cover the hole in defense.