mihairo wrote:About seeing a 4HP 9 9? Absolutely. Seen it with my own eyes on the TM. No doubt about it.
Also I've seen 4 nines on 3HP.
So, 5 nines on 4HP could be the only conclusion.
And the other conclusion could be that 3HP can't reach 5 nines.
So far my numbers are accurate.
4HP maximum
Obviously 5 tens
4HP minimum
9 9 9 9 9
10 9 9 9 8
10 10 9 8 8
3HP maximum
9 9 9 9 8
10 9 9 8 8
10 10 8 8 8
3HP minimum
9 9 7 7 7
10 8 7 7 7
2HP maximum
9 8 8 8 8
10 7 7 7 7
2HP minimum
8 8 7 7 7
9 7 7 7 7
2LP maximum
5 8 8 8 8 - already have one in my hockey squad. We'll see if he reaches 2LP 6 8. I'll let you know
2LP minimum
5 6 6 6 8
4 7 7 7 8
1LP maximum
5 6 6 6 7
4 6 7 7 8
1LP minimum
Obviosulsy 5 fours.
If you see something outside these numbers, please share.
Thank you.
A few personal comments about these stats.
Firstly, has anyone seen a player with higher than 2LP. They must exist, even if they are extremely rare. Or is every player guaranteed to have a 5-6 skill even if it's keeping, or set plays which mean nothing for an outfield player? And as such are incapable of being awarded 3LP or 4LP by a scout.
Secondly, the difference between some of the higher achieving 3 HP players & the lower end of the 4 HP players seems extremely borderline. To the point where I'd argue that some 4HP player should actually be 3HP players and vice versa. Similarly the same problem applies between high 2LP & low 3HP. As well as, High 1HP & low 2HP.
I understand that you'd have to apply some criteria to act as a cut off point to differentiate between categories of classification. Throw in an element of 5-10% error to keep things vaguely interesting/unpredictable and you have the current system. Which is still a significant improvement on the old system.