Football » English » ManagerZone talk

MZ - The Upfall

By hanzinho - 19-02-2019 23:32

[WCE]
President

I just won a very important semifinal of the Sigmund's Free Holiday Cup 2018. 5-1. Pure domination [H] In the final I am up against a very strong team from Poland. [img]http://thedeepzone.no/shared/0-9.png[/img] Can you guess which of the two teams I am facing in the final?I just won a very important semifinal of the Sigmund's Free Holiday Cup 2018.
5-1. Pure domination H

In the final I am up against a very strong team from Poland.



Can you guess which of the two teams I am facing in the final?

 

Page 1

 

 

Last Message

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By hanzinho - 19-02-2019 23:33

[WCE]
President

Also, if darkine can analyze the above match, it would be much appreciated. I need all the help I can get. Tough final!Also, if darkine can analyze the above match, it would be much appreciated. I need all the help I can get. Tough final!

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By hypnosis - 20-02-2019 00:08

[ᴀғʀɪᴄᴀ]

I will follow this game :)I will follow this game :)

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By manekaster - 20-02-2019 00:48

[TDF]
President

I wouldn’t be SuRpRiSed if you face them in the final. Anyway, congratulations on reaching the final.I wouldn’t be SuRpRiSed if you face them in the final. Anyway, congratulations on reaching the final.

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By darkline - 20-02-2019 00:53

[FLUSA]
President

Is not that hard to analyze hanz, did you watch the game? Because it's a perfect example of what I've been saying, the team that won took 6 headers on target and scored 6 goals, the team that loss didn't took a single header. Take the heading goals out of the picture and that game would have ended 3-0, which is a much more reasonable scoreline. You think the problem is that keepers are super keepers on some games, maybe, but I'm saying that a bigger problem is that keepers rarely stop a header on goal and that fact alone will take any statistic on shots on goal out of whack, find a way for your winger to make a cross to the head instead of the feet and you'll have a killer tactic, there are ways to increasing the chance of that happening but it doesn't just depends on the tactic you use but also on depends on how your opponent positions it's defense.

hanzinho wrote:

Also, if darkine can analyze the above match, it would be much appreciated. I need all the help I can get. Tough final!

Is not that hard to analyze hanz, did you watch the game? Because it's a perfect example of what I've been saying, the team that won took 6 headers on target and scored 6 goals, the team that loss didn't took a single header.

Take the heading goals out of the picture and that game would have ended 3-0, which is a much more reasonable scoreline.

You think the problem is that keepers are super keepers on some games, maybe, but I'm saying that a bigger problem is that keepers rarely stop a header on goal and that fact alone will take any statistic on shots on goal out of whack, find a way for your winger to make a cross to the head instead of the feet and you'll have a killer tactic, there are ways to increasing the chance of that happening but it doesn't just depends on the tactic you use but also on depends on how your opponent positions it's defense.

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By darkline - 20-02-2019 00:55

[FLUSA]
President

Btw, that game has a bug I have not seen in a while, around minute 28 the defender just holds the ball on the corner while time passes....Btw, that game has a bug I have not seen in a while, around minute 28 the defender just holds the ball on the corner while time passes....

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By hanzinho - 20-02-2019 01:04

[WCE]
President

Thanks ;) It wasn't so much bragging about my own game as it was to highlight the flaw of the simulator. That result is probably the worst I have seen ever. Possible the best team in MZ currently, losing 9-0. Polish NT keeper conceding 9 out of 12 shots. You aren't suppose to criticize the game currently, but until powderhead update the community rules I will take my chances (and contact a good lawyer in a worst case scenario..)

manekaster wrote:

I wouldn’t be SuRpRiSed if you face them in the final. Anyway, congratulations on reaching the final.

Thanks ;) It wasn't so much bragging about my own game as it was to highlight the flaw of the simulator.

That result is probably the worst I have seen ever. Possible the best team in MZ currently, losing 9-0. Polish NT keeper conceding 9 out of 12 shots. You aren't suppose to criticize the game currently, but until powderhead update the community rules I will take my chances (and contact a good lawyer in a worst case scenario..)

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By hanzinho - 20-02-2019 01:15

[WCE]
President

The problem here is that one of the very best teams in the game, conceded 9 out of 12 shots. His GK is a Polish international. When two wing-playing teams face off, it is quite coincidental which team gets the most headers.

darkline wrote:

Is not that hard to analyze hanz, did you watch the game? Because it's a perfect example of what I've been saying, the team that won took 6 headers on target and scored 6 goals, the team that loss didn't took a single header.

Take the heading goals out of the picture and that game would have ended 3-0, which is a much more reasonable scoreline.

You think the problem is that keepers are super keepers on some games, maybe, but I'm saying that a bigger problem is that keepers rarely stop a header on goal and that fact alone will take any statistic on shots on goal out of whack, find a way for your winger to make a cross to the head instead of the feet and you'll have a killer tactic, there are ways to increasing the chance of that happening but it doesn't just depends on the tactic you use but also on depends on how your opponent positions it's defense.

The problem here is that one of the very best teams in the game, conceded 9 out of 12 shots. His GK is a Polish international.

When two wing-playing teams face off, it is quite coincidental which team gets the most headers.

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By manekaster - 20-02-2019 02:16

[TDF]
President

An extreme deviation from how it should be. While we're at it, just take a look at a certain team's road to the U21 National Cup final. Only the knockout stages.

hanzinho wrote:

That result is probably the worst I have seen ever. Possible the best team in MZ currently, losing 9-0. Polish NT keeper conceding 9 out of 12 shots. You aren't suppose to criticize the game currently, but until powderhead update the community rules I will take my chances (and contact a good lawyer in a worst case scenario..)

An extreme deviation from how it should be.
While we're at it, just take a look at a certain team's road to the U21 National Cup final. Only the knockout stages.

Re: MZ - The Upfall

By deleted_8537346 - 20-02-2019 05:42

And what are you hoping with the lawyer? To force online-game corporation (a private property of people X) to update game's code, because You (voluntary user; a client - who knows how things are here, but You still pay) are not satisfied with the game results? There are 5000 managers online [color=red]actively[/color] daily. [color=red](edit: currently 11 000 users . 08:53 +2 GMT 20th Feb 2019)[/color] I have about 50 games in week. Lets say people have normally about 6-10 games in week. So the game must give 50 000++++++ (half million?) satisfying game results in a week. When somebody wins, somebody has to lose? Correct? I have seen some "disappointing" examples, about 10 or so, ok lets say 50 total. These are like 0,001% of [u]weekly[/u] games. Your "Downfall" topic was active many months here, You told me, FA, to stay away from Your topic. Crew gave you chance to shine and gather up all disappointed people, to see more broken results. They hoped to see some great technical advise. The project failed, not many joined the whistle choir. Then You were not satisfied, again, that few people support you, You see Analyst Project has more support than Your "downfall topic" - so you picked "joking" strategy, took Analyst Project and made sarcastic edit on it, hoped to get attention like that. I, personally, don't understand You - rank 1 manager - You win so many games, good team and knowledge, I think You have millions laying around there, You have friends and authority, but Your input to community in forums is destructive criticism . If You need attention, figure out something better, label the thread something cool and friendly, take things easy, don't search the pseudoproblems - like results in play-off cups or what ever. When You play 50 games in week - how big % of the game results are not satisfying for you? And are these games where You lost or where You won? I guess game results, where You got win, are fine, right? But someone lost? Should the manager, who lost game in a game, sue a MZ? When there is site X, site owner don't have to keep open threads, where users can criticize the site - when that thread is allowed and available, it is privilege. Don't abuse the privilege. When that thread [b]is getting [color=red]offending[/color][/b] or joking on site's owners, the thread will be closed. [color=red]Corrected few typomistakes with edit .. edit2 : fixed "active users" and "total matches in week" mistake // raamatupood[/color]And what are you hoping with the lawyer?

To force online-game corporation (a private property of people X) to update game's code, because You (voluntary user; a client - who knows how things are here, but You still pay) are not satisfied with the game results?

There are 5000 managers online actively daily. (edit: currently 11 000 users . 08:53 +2 GMT 20th Feb 2019)
I have about 50 games in week. Lets say people have normally about 6-10 games in week.
So the game must give 50 000++++++ (half million?) satisfying game results in a week. When somebody wins, somebody has to lose? Correct?

I have seen some "disappointing" examples, about 10 or so, ok lets say 50 total. These are like 0,001% of weekly games.

Your "Downfall" topic was active many months here, You told me, FA, to stay away from Your topic. Crew gave you chance to shine and gather up all disappointed people, to see more broken results. They hoped to see some great technical advise.
The project failed, not many joined the whistle choir.

Then You were not satisfied, again, that few people support you, You see Analyst Project has more support than Your "downfall topic" - so you picked "joking" strategy, took Analyst Project and made sarcastic edit on it, hoped to get attention like that.

I, personally, don't understand You - rank 1 manager - You win so many games, good team and knowledge, I think You have millions laying around there, You have friends and authority, but Your input to community in forums is destructive criticism . If You need attention, figure out something better, label the thread something cool and friendly, take things easy, don't search the pseudoproblems - like results in play-off cups or what ever.

When You play 50 games in week - how big % of the game results are not satisfying for you? And are these games where You lost or where You won? I guess game results, where You got win, are fine, right? But someone lost? Should the manager, who lost game in a game, sue a MZ?

When there is site X, site owner don't have to keep open threads, where users can criticize the site - when that thread is allowed and available, it is privilege. Don't abuse the privilege. When that thread is getting offending or joking on site's owners, the thread will be closed.

Corrected few typomistakes with edit .. edit2 : fixed "active users" and "total matches in week" mistake // raamatupood

Edited: 20-02-2019 07:57
Total edits: 4

 

Page 1